TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1497
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/17
AB  - ... "Na istom tragu, neposredno suočena sa Holokaustom, Hana Arent (Hannah Arendt) zaključuje da ni religijsko ni filozofsko nasleđe nije uspevalo da pojmi „radikalno zlo“, uključujući i tvorca tog izraza, Imanuela Kanta (Immanuel Kant), koji ga je hitro racionalizovao u predstavu „izopačene zle volje“ - objašnjive razumljivim motivima. Stoga nas je to kantovsko nasleđe - rečima Ričarda Bernstina (Richard Bernstein), koji nastoji da rekonstruiše misaonu putanju Arent - ostavilo bez ikakve „potpore kada pokušavamo da razumemo fenomen koji nas suočava s nadmoćnom stvarnošću i koji ruši sva nama poznata merila“ (Bernstin 2002: 83; uporediti Bernstin 2005: 388–389). Kao što klasična politička teorija ne objašnjava totalitarizme dvadestog veka, tako klasične etičke kategorije više nisu dovoljne za mišljenje Holokausta - sasvim nove pojave, za koju nemamo odgovarajuće pojmove"...
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Holokaust i filozofija
T1  - Aušvic: skandal za mišljenje ili skandal mišljenja
SP  - 198
EP  - 230
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_17
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2018",
abstract = "... "Na istom tragu, neposredno suočena sa Holokaustom, Hana Arent (Hannah Arendt) zaključuje da ni religijsko ni filozofsko nasleđe nije uspevalo da pojmi „radikalno zlo“, uključujući i tvorca tog izraza, Imanuela Kanta (Immanuel Kant), koji ga je hitro racionalizovao u predstavu „izopačene zle volje“ - objašnjive razumljivim motivima. Stoga nas je to kantovsko nasleđe - rečima Ričarda Bernstina (Richard Bernstein), koji nastoji da rekonstruiše misaonu putanju Arent - ostavilo bez ikakve „potpore kada pokušavamo da razumemo fenomen koji nas suočava s nadmoćnom stvarnošću i koji ruši sva nama poznata merila“ (Bernstin 2002: 83; uporediti Bernstin 2005: 388–389). Kao što klasična politička teorija ne objašnjava totalitarizme dvadestog veka, tako klasične etičke kategorije više nisu dovoljne za mišljenje Holokausta - sasvim nove pojave, za koju nemamo odgovarajuće pojmove"...",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Holokaust i filozofija",
booktitle = "Aušvic: skandal za mišljenje ili skandal mišljenja",
pages = "198-230",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_17"
}

Krstić, P.. (2018). Aušvic: skandal za mišljenje ili skandal mišljenja. in Holokaust i filozofija
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 198-230.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_17

Krstić P. Aušvic: skandal za mišljenje ili skandal mišljenja. in Holokaust i filozofija. 2018;:198-230.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_17 .

Krstić, Predrag, "Aušvic: skandal za mišljenje ili skandal mišljenja" in Holokaust i filozofija (2018):198-230,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_17 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1402
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/14
AB  - Kao što je verovatno slučaj sa svakom neobičnom i pažnje vrednom knjigom, naslov može da zbuni ili zavara. Pisanje stradanja lako bi moglo asocirati na neku borhesovsko-ekovsku prozopopeju ove ili one pogibelji, a dodatak "knjiga o knjigama" upućivati na postradale biblioteke, imaginarne ili stvarne. I to ne bi bilo sasvim pogrešno. Tek treći deo naslova, međutim, preciznije ili sasvim precizno kazuje o čemu je reč: "Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu". Pa čak i tu je potrebna još jedna specifikacija: reč je naime o navigatoru kroz one publikacije koje su napisane ili prevedene "u okvirima jugoslovenskog i srpskog izdavaštva" i koje su pokušale da "posvedoče, istraže, prouče, proniknu u jedan jedinstveni užas".
AB  - As is probably the case with any unusual and noteworthy book, the title can be confusing or misleading. The writing of suffering could easily be associated with some prosopopeia by Horhe Luis Borhes or Umberto Eco or other perils, and the addition of "books about books" to refer to damaged libraries, imaginary or real. And that would not be entirely wrong. Only just the third part of the title, however, states more precisely or quite precisely what it is about: "A Guide to Holocaust Publications". And even here, another specification is needed: it is about the navigator through those publications which were written or translated "within the framework of Yugoslav and Serbian publishing" and which tried to "testify, investigate, study, come up into a single horror".
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Biljana Albahari, Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama. Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2017.
SP  - 1206
EP  - 1208
IS  - 4
VL  - 28
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_14
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Kao što je verovatno slučaj sa svakom neobičnom i pažnje vrednom knjigom, naslov može da zbuni ili zavara. Pisanje stradanja lako bi moglo asocirati na neku borhesovsko-ekovsku prozopopeju ove ili one pogibelji, a dodatak "knjiga o knjigama" upućivati na postradale biblioteke, imaginarne ili stvarne. I to ne bi bilo sasvim pogrešno. Tek treći deo naslova, međutim, preciznije ili sasvim precizno kazuje o čemu je reč: "Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu". Pa čak i tu je potrebna još jedna specifikacija: reč je naime o navigatoru kroz one publikacije koje su napisane ili prevedene "u okvirima jugoslovenskog i srpskog izdavaštva" i koje su pokušale da "posvedoče, istraže, prouče, proniknu u jedan jedinstveni užas"., As is probably the case with any unusual and noteworthy book, the title can be confusing or misleading. The writing of suffering could easily be associated with some prosopopeia by Horhe Luis Borhes or Umberto Eco or other perils, and the addition of "books about books" to refer to damaged libraries, imaginary or real. And that would not be entirely wrong. Only just the third part of the title, however, states more precisely or quite precisely what it is about: "A Guide to Holocaust Publications". And even here, another specification is needed: it is about the navigator through those publications which were written or translated "within the framework of Yugoslav and Serbian publishing" and which tried to "testify, investigate, study, come up into a single horror".",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Biljana Albahari, Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama. Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2017.",
pages = "1206-1208",
number = "4",
volume = "28",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_14"
}

Krstić, P.. (2017). Biljana Albahari, Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama. Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2017.. in Filozofija i društvo, 28(4), 1206-1208.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_14

Krstić P. Biljana Albahari, Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama. Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2017.. in Filozofija i društvo. 2017;28(4):1206-1208.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_14 .

Krstić, Predrag, "Biljana Albahari, Pisanje stradanja: knjiga o knjigama. Vodič kroz publikacije o Holokaustu, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd, 2017." in Filozofija i društvo, 28, no. 4 (2017):1206-1208,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_14 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/722
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/11
PB  - Banja Luka : Udruženje za filozofiju i društvenu misao
T2  - Kritička teorija društva : zbornik radova
T1  - Auschwitz, Adorno i posle
SP  - 9
EP  - 33
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_11
ER  - 

@article{
editor = "Šarić, Željko",
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2010",
publisher = "Banja Luka : Udruženje za filozofiju i društvenu misao",
journal = "Kritička teorija društva : zbornik radova",
title = "Auschwitz, Adorno i posle",
pages = "9-33",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_11"
}

Šarić, Ž.,& Krstić, P.. (2010). Auschwitz, Adorno i posle. in Kritička teorija društva : zbornik radova
Banja Luka : Udruženje za filozofiju i društvenu misao., 9-33.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_11

Šarić Ž, Krstić P. Auschwitz, Adorno i posle. in Kritička teorija društva : zbornik radova. 2010;:9-33.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_11 .

Šarić, Željko, Krstić, Predrag, "Auschwitz, Adorno i posle" in Kritička teorija društva : zbornik radova (2010):9-33,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_11 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2008
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1145
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/12
T1  - Auschwitz, Adorno i posle, Međunarodni naučni skup "Kritička teorija društva", Banja Luka: 15-19 decembar, 2008.
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_12
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2008",
title = "Auschwitz, Adorno i posle, Međunarodni naučni skup "Kritička teorija društva", Banja Luka: 15-19 decembar, 2008.",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_12"
}

Krstić, P.. (2008). Auschwitz, Adorno i posle, Međunarodni naučni skup "Kritička teorija društva", Banja Luka: 15-19 decembar, 2008.. .
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_12

Krstić P. Auschwitz, Adorno i posle, Međunarodni naučni skup "Kritička teorija društva", Banja Luka: 15-19 decembar, 2008.. 2008;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_12 .

Krstić, Predrag, "Auschwitz, Adorno i posle, Međunarodni naučni skup "Kritička teorija društva", Banja Luka: 15-19 decembar, 2008." (2008),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jdb_12 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/695
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/10
AB  - In this paper the author is attempting to establish the relationship – or the lack of it – of the Critical Theory to the “Jewish question” and justification of perceiving signs of Jewish religious heritage in the thought of the representatives of this movement. The holocaust marked out by the name of “Auschwitz”, is here tested as a point where the nature of this relationship has been decided. In this encounter with the cardinal challenge for the contemporary social theory, the particularity of the Frankfurt School reaction is here revealed through Adorno installing Auschwitz as unexpected but lawful emblem of the ending of the course that modern history has assumed. The critique of this “fascination” with Auschwitz, as well as certain theoretical pacification and measured positioning of the holocaust into discontinued plane of “unfinished” and continuation and closure of the valued project, are given through communicative-theoretical pre-orientation of Jürgen Habermas’s Critical Theory and of his followers. Finally, through the work of Detlev Claussen, it is suggested that in the youngest generation of Adorno’s students there are signs of revision to once already revised Critical Theory and a kind of defractured and differentiated return to
the initial understanding of the decisiveness of the holocaust experience. This shift in the attitude of the Critical Theory thinkers to the provocation of holocaust is not, however, particularly reflected towards the status of Jews and their tradition, but more to the age old questioning and explanatory patterns for which they served as a “model”. The question of validity of the enlightenment project, the nature of occidental rationalism, (non)existence of historical theology and understanding of the identity and emacipation – describe the circle of problems around which the disagreement is concentrated in the social critical theory.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Kritička teorija i holokaust
T1  - Critical Theory and the Holocaust
DO  - 10.2298/FID0629037K
SP  - 37
EP  - 73
IS  - 1
VL  - 29
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2006",
abstract = "In this paper the author is attempting to establish the relationship – or the lack of it – of the Critical Theory to the “Jewish question” and justification of perceiving signs of Jewish religious heritage in the thought of the representatives of this movement. The holocaust marked out by the name of “Auschwitz”, is here tested as a point where the nature of this relationship has been decided. In this encounter with the cardinal challenge for the contemporary social theory, the particularity of the Frankfurt School reaction is here revealed through Adorno installing Auschwitz as unexpected but lawful emblem of the ending of the course that modern history has assumed. The critique of this “fascination” with Auschwitz, as well as certain theoretical pacification and measured positioning of the holocaust into discontinued plane of “unfinished” and continuation and closure of the valued project, are given through communicative-theoretical pre-orientation of Jürgen Habermas’s Critical Theory and of his followers. Finally, through the work of Detlev Claussen, it is suggested that in the youngest generation of Adorno’s students there are signs of revision to once already revised Critical Theory and a kind of defractured and differentiated return to
the initial understanding of the decisiveness of the holocaust experience. This shift in the attitude of the Critical Theory thinkers to the provocation of holocaust is not, however, particularly reflected towards the status of Jews and their tradition, but more to the age old questioning and explanatory patterns for which they served as a “model”. The question of validity of the enlightenment project, the nature of occidental rationalism, (non)existence of historical theology and understanding of the identity and emacipation – describe the circle of problems around which the disagreement is concentrated in the social critical theory.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Kritička teorija i holokaust, Critical Theory and the Holocaust",
doi = "10.2298/FID0629037K",
pages = "37-73",
number = "1",
volume = "29"
}

Krstić, P.. (2006). Kritička teorija i holokaust. in Filozofija i društvo
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(1), 37-73.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629037K

Krstić P. Kritička teorija i holokaust. in Filozofija i društvo. 2006;29(1):37-73.
doi:10.2298/FID0629037K .

Krstić, Predrag, "Kritička teorija i holokaust" in Filozofija i društvo, 29, no. 1 (2006):37-73,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629037K . .