TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/695
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/10
AB  - In this paper the author is attempting to establish the relationship – or the lack of it – of the Critical Theory to the “Jewish question” and justification of perceiving signs of Jewish religious heritage in the thought of the representatives of this movement. The holocaust marked out by the name of “Auschwitz”, is here tested as a point where the nature of this relationship has been decided. In this encounter with the cardinal challenge for the contemporary social theory, the particularity of the Frankfurt School reaction is here revealed through Adorno installing Auschwitz as unexpected but lawful emblem of the ending of the course that modern history has assumed. The critique of this “fascination” with Auschwitz, as well as certain theoretical pacification and measured positioning of the holocaust into discontinued plane of “unfinished” and continuation and closure of the valued project, are given through communicative-theoretical pre-orientation of Jürgen Habermas’s Critical Theory and of his followers. Finally, through the work of Detlev Claussen, it is suggested that in the youngest generation of Adorno’s students there are signs of revision to once already revised Critical Theory and a kind of defractured and differentiated return to
the initial understanding of the decisiveness of the holocaust experience. This shift in the attitude of the Critical Theory thinkers to the provocation of holocaust is not, however, particularly reflected towards the status of Jews and their tradition, but more to the age old questioning and explanatory patterns for which they served as a “model”. The question of validity of the enlightenment project, the nature of occidental rationalism, (non)existence of historical theology and understanding of the identity and emacipation – describe the circle of problems around which the disagreement is concentrated in the social critical theory.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Kritička teorija i holokaust
T1  - Critical Theory and the Holocaust
DO  - 10.2298/FID0629037K
SP  - 37
EP  - 73
IS  - 1
VL  - 29
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2006",
abstract = "In this paper the author is attempting to establish the relationship – or the lack of it – of the Critical Theory to the “Jewish question” and justification of perceiving signs of Jewish religious heritage in the thought of the representatives of this movement. The holocaust marked out by the name of “Auschwitz”, is here tested as a point where the nature of this relationship has been decided. In this encounter with the cardinal challenge for the contemporary social theory, the particularity of the Frankfurt School reaction is here revealed through Adorno installing Auschwitz as unexpected but lawful emblem of the ending of the course that modern history has assumed. The critique of this “fascination” with Auschwitz, as well as certain theoretical pacification and measured positioning of the holocaust into discontinued plane of “unfinished” and continuation and closure of the valued project, are given through communicative-theoretical pre-orientation of Jürgen Habermas’s Critical Theory and of his followers. Finally, through the work of Detlev Claussen, it is suggested that in the youngest generation of Adorno’s students there are signs of revision to once already revised Critical Theory and a kind of defractured and differentiated return to
the initial understanding of the decisiveness of the holocaust experience. This shift in the attitude of the Critical Theory thinkers to the provocation of holocaust is not, however, particularly reflected towards the status of Jews and their tradition, but more to the age old questioning and explanatory patterns for which they served as a “model”. The question of validity of the enlightenment project, the nature of occidental rationalism, (non)existence of historical theology and understanding of the identity and emacipation – describe the circle of problems around which the disagreement is concentrated in the social critical theory.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Kritička teorija i holokaust, Critical Theory and the Holocaust",
doi = "10.2298/FID0629037K",
pages = "37-73",
number = "1",
volume = "29"
}

Krstić, P.. (2006). Kritička teorija i holokaust. in Filozofija i društvo
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 29(1), 37-73.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629037K

Krstić P. Kritička teorija i holokaust. in Filozofija i društvo. 2006;29(1):37-73.
doi:10.2298/FID0629037K .

Krstić, Predrag, "Kritička teorija i holokaust" in Filozofija i društvo, 29, no. 1 (2006):37-73,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629037K . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Molnar, Aleksandar
PY  - 2006
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/694
UR  - https://www.jevrejskadigitalnabiblioteka.rs/handle/123456789/9
AB  - In the article the author is following the development of Alfred Rosenberg’s social and political theory. Special attention is given to the anti-Christian attitude of
the so-called “chief ideologist of Third Reich”. Although one among the creators of the apocalyptic anti-Semitist ideology (about “final battle” with the Jews – perceived
as the powers of Evil incarnated) he opposed Nazi “Eastern politics” during the World War II. Instead of atrocities against the eastern peoples (Ukrainians, Russians
etc.) he was prepared to give them certain autonomy and to treat them as some kind of racially inferior allies. For him, only Jews deserved extermination („once for all“)
and it was this ultimate goal he expected to shape not only German foreign policy but also war itself.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Obračun Alfreda Rosenberga sa hrišćanstvom
T1  - Alfred Rosenberg's Clash with Christianity
DO  - 10.2298/FID0629009M
SP  - 9
EP  - 35
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Molnar, Aleksandar",
year = "2006",
abstract = "In the article the author is following the development of Alfred Rosenberg’s social and political theory. Special attention is given to the anti-Christian attitude of
the so-called “chief ideologist of Third Reich”. Although one among the creators of the apocalyptic anti-Semitist ideology (about “final battle” with the Jews – perceived
as the powers of Evil incarnated) he opposed Nazi “Eastern politics” during the World War II. Instead of atrocities against the eastern peoples (Ukrainians, Russians
etc.) he was prepared to give them certain autonomy and to treat them as some kind of racially inferior allies. For him, only Jews deserved extermination („once for all“)
and it was this ultimate goal he expected to shape not only German foreign policy but also war itself.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Obračun Alfreda Rosenberga sa hrišćanstvom, Alfred Rosenberg's Clash with Christianity",
doi = "10.2298/FID0629009M",
pages = "9-35"
}

Molnar, A.. (2006). Obračun Alfreda Rosenberga sa hrišćanstvom. in Filozofija i društvo
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 9-35.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629009M

Molnar A. Obračun Alfreda Rosenberga sa hrišćanstvom. in Filozofija i društvo. 2006;:9-35.
doi:10.2298/FID0629009M .

Molnar, Aleksandar, "Obračun Alfreda Rosenberga sa hrišćanstvom" in Filozofija i društvo (2006):9-35,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0629009M . .